Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:
> At 11:32 AM 3/15/2007 -0700, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
>> Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:
>> While using mng and
>> video/x-mng would be technically valid (since a MNG decoder would be
>> able to interpret at least the static PNG data), explicitly specifying
>> that option in the spec seems like it would just lead to confusion.
>
> Stating the truth would just lead to confusion. Right. Doing it the
> right way won't work. Right.
Stating what truth? Saying "image/png" is as true as "video/x-mng", and
leads to less confusion. Saying in the spec that APNGs may also be
served as "video/x-png" would probably be fine, though I can't see any
advantage in actually serving one as video/x-png. (Or, indeed, of
actually sniffing deep enough into the stream to decide whether
something is image/png or video/x-png.)
- Vlad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV_______________________________________________
png-mng-misc mailing list
png-mng-misc@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
