At 12:26 PM 3/15/2007 -0700, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
>Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:
>Stating what truth? Saying "image/png" is as true as "video/x-mng"
If the file contains an animation that the author expects the
decoder to render as an animation, then "image/png" is a bald-faced lie.
Twice. Once because "image" calls for still images, and once because
"png" calls for still images.
Now what we need to do is find some scheme that will fool IE without
lying and breaking specifications. I'm trying to help with that.
I'm suggesting video/x-mng because it's entirely truthful and
spec-compliant.
If it turns out that, as you say, the only way to fool IE is to break
specs, then we'll consider that, but I suspect it would sway a few
votes against the proposal.
Glenn
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV_______________________________________________
png-mng-misc mailing list
png-mng-misc@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc
