Re: AV program
|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 | Next > |
 |
|
|
|
Re: AV program
by Terry R.
::
Rate this Message:
On 8/29/2007 9:06 PM On a whim, Moz Champion (Dan) pounded out on the
keyboard > Terry R. wrote: >> On 8/29/2007 2:25 PM On a whim, Moz Champion (Dan) pounded out on the >> keyboard >> >>> Jay Garcia wrote: >>>> On 29.08.2007 10:00, Terry R. wrote: >>>> >>>> --- Original Message --- >>>> >>>>> You are. You and your facts go as far as your advice, no where. >>>>> You keep telling people they don't need AV programs and I'll keep >>>>> telling them they do. Of course how much protection do you need >>>>> playing solitaire... >>>> For a long time I was a proponent of not installing or finding the need >>>> to use an AV application. Today, that's different and now I'm on the >>>> "other side". What changed my mind was that I installed a copy of >>>> Kaspersky AV from one of my client's machines just to "see" what it >>>> does/did. I was amazed at what was attempting to infect my machine, etc. >>>> Within hours I bought AND registered my own copy and it now runs on my >>>> machine as well as across the network, etc. Haven't looked back since. >>>> >>>> Sorry for the reference but not having an AV is like having a pin-hole >>>> in a condom. 'fore long you're gonna be changing diapers. 8-) >>>> >>> >>> Well who said NOT to use any AV program in the first place... I sure >>> didnt! >>> >>> >>> Terry is making up lies and false accusations. I don't discuss things >>> with liars >> You always revert to name calling Dan. Grow up. Since as long as I can >> remember, you always tout how "I don't use any AV programs". Are you >> changing your tune? >> >> In regards to your comments, I don't lie and I've never made a false >> accusation. You just don't have anything further to discuss with me >> because your methods are outdated. >> >> Follow up set to moz.general >> > > > I dont speak to liars. Great response. One of your typical ones. PROVE where I've lied rather than empty accusations. -- Terry R. Anti-spam measures are included in my email address. Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Moz Champion (Dan)
::
Rate this Message:
Terry R. wrote:
> On 8/29/2007 9:06 PM On a whim, Moz Champion (Dan) pounded out on the > keyboard > >> Terry R. wrote: >>> On 8/29/2007 2:25 PM On a whim, Moz Champion (Dan) pounded out on the >>> keyboard >>> >>>> Jay Garcia wrote: >>>>> On 29.08.2007 10:00, Terry R. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> --- Original Message --- >>>>> >>>>>> You are. You and your facts go as far as your advice, no where. >>>>>> You keep telling people they don't need AV programs and I'll keep >>>>>> telling them they do. Of course how much protection do you need >>>>>> playing solitaire... >>>>> For a long time I was a proponent of not installing or finding the >>>>> need >>>>> to use an AV application. Today, that's different and now I'm on the >>>>> "other side". What changed my mind was that I installed a copy of >>>>> Kaspersky AV from one of my client's machines just to "see" what it >>>>> does/did. I was amazed at what was attempting to infect my machine, >>>>> etc. >>>>> Within hours I bought AND registered my own copy and it now runs on my >>>>> machine as well as across the network, etc. Haven't looked back since. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for the reference but not having an AV is like having a pin-hole >>>>> in a condom. 'fore long you're gonna be changing diapers. 8-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well who said NOT to use any AV program in the first place... I sure >>>> didnt! >>>> >>>> >>>> Terry is making up lies and false accusations. I don't discuss >>>> things with liars >>> You always revert to name calling Dan. Grow up. Since as long as I >>> can remember, you always tout how "I don't use any AV programs". Are >>> you changing your tune? >>> >>> In regards to your comments, I don't lie and I've never made a false >>> accusation. You just don't have anything further to discuss with me >>> because your methods are outdated. >>> >>> Follow up set to moz.general >>> >> >> >> I dont speak to liars. > > Great response. One of your typical ones. PROVE where I've lied rather > than empty accusations. > > > Listen idiot! You said this! Quote "You keep telling people they don't need AV programs..." UnQuote WHO the heck said people don't need AV programs!!! Because I sure the heck didn't! YOU are claiming I aaid so.... and I did NOT. YOU SIR are nothing more than an idiotic LIAR! YOU show me where I said people shouldn't use AV programs!!! Come on now! I can show YOU where YOU lied! And you can't show me where I said that? Despicable liar WHAT I said , if you had the brains to READ, is that I don't see a need for a 'real time online scanner'. I have ALSO stated, that I suggest NOT opening an attachment, storing it for a week, updating your AV program, checking the attachment and then opening it.... HOW THE HECK can anyone do that WITHOUT an AV program you flaming IDIOT! LEARN TO READ YOU IDIOT AND STOP WITH FRAUDULENT CLAIMS!!!!!! I DID NOT TELL ANYONE NOT TO USE AV PROGRAMS!!!! I DID NOT TELL ANYONE THEY DONT NEED AN AV PROGRAM!!! I TOLD PEOPLE TO USE AV PROGRAMS!!! I SAID I USED AV PROGRAMS!!!! So come on, IDIOT!!! Show me where I told people not to use AV programs! Put up or SHUT up you idiotic liar. And yes, I'm ticked. You Sir, are an idiotic LIAR who can't read _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Terry R.
::
Rate this Message:
On 8/30/2007 9:38 AM On a whim, Moz Champion (Dan) pounded out on the
keyboard > Terry R. wrote: >> On 8/29/2007 9:06 PM On a whim, Moz Champion (Dan) pounded out on the >> keyboard >> >>> Terry R. wrote: >>>> On 8/29/2007 2:25 PM On a whim, Moz Champion (Dan) pounded out on the >>>> keyboard >>>> >>>>> Jay Garcia wrote: >>>>>> On 29.08.2007 10:00, Terry R. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> --- Original Message --- >>>>>> >>>>>>> You are. You and your facts go as far as your advice, no where. >>>>>>> You keep telling people they don't need AV programs and I'll keep >>>>>>> telling them they do. Of course how much protection do you need >>>>>>> playing solitaire... >>>>>> For a long time I was a proponent of not installing or finding the >>>>>> need >>>>>> to use an AV application. Today, that's different and now I'm on the >>>>>> "other side". What changed my mind was that I installed a copy of >>>>>> Kaspersky AV from one of my client's machines just to "see" what it >>>>>> does/did. I was amazed at what was attempting to infect my machine, >>>>>> etc. >>>>>> Within hours I bought AND registered my own copy and it now runs on my >>>>>> machine as well as across the network, etc. Haven't looked back since. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for the reference but not having an AV is like having a pin-hole >>>>>> in a condom. 'fore long you're gonna be changing diapers. 8-) >>>>>> >>>>> Well who said NOT to use any AV program in the first place... I sure >>>>> didnt! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Terry is making up lies and false accusations. I don't discuss >>>>> things with liars >>>> You always revert to name calling Dan. Grow up. Since as long as I >>>> can remember, you always tout how "I don't use any AV programs". Are >>>> you changing your tune? >>>> >>>> In regards to your comments, I don't lie and I've never made a false >>>> accusation. You just don't have anything further to discuss with me >>>> because your methods are outdated. >>>> >>>> Follow up set to moz.general >>>> >>> >>> I dont speak to liars. >> Great response. One of your typical ones. PROVE where I've lied rather >> than empty accusations. >> >> >> > > Listen idiot! > > You said this! > > Quote > "You keep telling people they don't need AV programs..." > UnQuote > > > WHO the heck said people don't need AV programs!!! Because I sure the > heck didn't! YOU are claiming I aaid so.... and I did NOT. > > YOU SIR are nothing more than an idiotic LIAR! > > YOU show me where I said people shouldn't use AV programs!!! Come on > now! I can show YOU where YOU lied! And you can't show me where I said > that? Despicable liar > > > WHAT I said , if you had the brains to READ, is that I don't see a need > for a 'real time online scanner'. I have ALSO stated, that I suggest NOT > opening an attachment, storing it for a week, updating your AV program, > checking the attachment and then opening it.... HOW THE HECK can anyone > do that WITHOUT an AV program you flaming IDIOT! > > > LEARN TO READ YOU IDIOT AND STOP WITH FRAUDULENT CLAIMS!!!!!! > > > I DID NOT TELL ANYONE NOT TO USE AV PROGRAMS!!!! > I DID NOT TELL ANYONE THEY DONT NEED AN AV PROGRAM!!! > I TOLD PEOPLE TO USE AV PROGRAMS!!! > I SAID I USED AV PROGRAMS!!!! > > > So come on, IDIOT!!! Show me where I told people not to use AV programs! > Put up or SHUT up you idiotic liar. > > > > And yes, I'm ticked. You Sir, are an idiotic LIAR who can't read You must feel big calling me an idiot hiding behind a screen. And Dan, don't mix "Sir" with "idiot" and "liar". Sorry, your four "I"'s are lies. In the past you HAVE told people they don't need AV programs and that you DON'T use them. In Secnews, and in mixed comments here. I remember because we've had these arguments before, so don't try and change your tune now. Just like when you were stating there isn't a virus for the Mac, you argue about fabrications in your own mind. And if you'd like to keep calling me names, I challenge you to meet me face to face mister big mouth. If you can't say it to my face, shut the F*** up. I live in So. Ca. Put up or shut up. -- Terry R. Anti-spam measures are included in my email address. Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: AV program
by Chris Ilias-2
::
Rate this Message:
On 8/30/07 6:06 PM, _Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo_ spoke thusly:
> Chris Ilias wrote: >> On 8/30/07 5:34 PM, _Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo_ spoke thusly: >>> Chris Ilias wrote: >>>> Each OT post in this thread is being added to the database; and >>>> if/when any warnings are sent, they will be sent privately. >>> I don't know how the postings within this thread are being added to >>> the database. The OP asked about antivirus programs, and the >>> discussion about AVs is STILL continuing. Therefore, there is NO OT >>> happening. >> >> I didn't say the entire thread was OT. I was "Each OT post in this >> thread". There are instances of personal attacks, etc., that should >> obviously be added. >> >>> {Thinking to myself: since Chris 1 posted an OT message, I wonder if >>> it will be added to the database, and I wonder if he'll get one of >>> those offensive and threatening message about OT discussions? Hmmmm, >>> one wonders.} >> >> Where did I post an OT message? > > by saying: "Each OT post in this thread is being added to the database . > . . ." Because you put a follow up to Mo.gen, and again in this message > you put another followup to mo.gen again. Therefore, since you put a > follow up to the mo.gen group, its therefore an OT discussion. Didn't you say, that you weren't going to answer anymore questions, from Nir, Q, or myself? <http://www.mozilla.org/community/etiquette.html> "Off-topic discussion not taken to private email, mozilla.general, or any place where it is not considered off-topic, by someone who knows they should be taking it elsewhere, is eligible for removal from the news server." I made an effort to take the discussion to mozilla.general, therefore that message was not eligible for the database. Reg posted a message in that thread, with the follow-up set, and you don't see that message gone, do you? The only cases I can think of right now, that would make it eligible, is if the message I was replying to, had a follow-up set, and I ignored it. -- Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca> List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird, test-multimedia _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: AV program
by Blinky the Shark
::
Rate this Message:
Andrew DeFaria wrote: > squaredancer wrote: >> On 01.09.2007 00:19, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Andrew >> DeFaria to generate the following:? : >>> On Aug 31, 3:46 am, squaredancer <squaredan...@...> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> "nics" are ladies underpants.... :-P >>>> >>> Precisely. Now the question is why is Dan wearing ladies underpants! :- >>> P >>> >>> >> you, Sir, are a ???? >> Did you READ what Dan wrote, or do you have comprehensive problems?? >> *DID* Dan say he *WEARS* nics?? show him where you read that! >> You can't. because he didn't say that... >> >> so now, Andrew, you may start a war with Dan on the new [OT] subject >> of "nics".... :-D > Are you that dense - or just trying to be funny. If the former - > pathetic. If the later - not funny. The charge was that people who have > "champion" in their "nic" are exempt. I asked what a "nic" was. You > responded it was ladies underpants. So I joked that since Dan had > "champion" in his "nic", why was he wearing ladies underpants. This is > known as a joke or extending the joke you were making. It was also a jab > at Dan, who's one of my favorite targets, especially when he's got his > (excuse me) undies in a bunch like he has and acting irrational as he > clearly is. I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been spelled correctly in the first place. -- Blinky RLU 297263 Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28 _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by The Real Bev
::
Rate this Message:
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> squaredancer wrote: >>> Andrew DeFaria to generate the following:? : >>>> On Aug 31, 3:46 am, squaredancer <squaredan...@...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "nics" are ladies underpants.... :-P >>>>> >>>> Precisely. Now the question is why is Dan wearing ladies underpants! :- >>>> >>> you, Sir, are a ???? >>> Did you READ what Dan wrote, or do you have comprehensive problems?? >>> *DID* Dan say he *WEARS* nics?? show him where you read that! >>> You can't. because he didn't say that... >>> >>> so now, Andrew, you may start a war with Dan on the new [OT] subject >>> of "nics".... :-D >> Are you that dense - or just trying to be funny. If the former - >> pathetic. If the later - not funny. The charge was that people who have >> "champion" in their "nic" are exempt. I asked what a "nic" was. You >> responded it was ladies underpants. So I joked that since Dan had >> "champion" in his "nic", why was he wearing ladies underpants. This is >> known as a joke or extending the joke you were making. It was also a jab >> at Dan, who's one of my favorite targets, especially when he's got his >> (excuse me) undies in a bunch like he has and acting irrational as he >> clearly is. > > I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been > spelled correctly in the first place. No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty knickers") -- Cheers, Bev (Happy Linux User #85683, Slackware 11.0) ***************************************************** Nothing is so stupid that you can't find somebody who did it at least once if you look hard enough. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Blinky the Shark
::
Rate this Message:
The Real Bev wrote: > Blinky the Shark wrote: >> Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>> squaredancer wrote: >>>> Andrew DeFaria to generate the following:? : >>>>> On Aug 31, 3:46 am, squaredancer <squaredan...@...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "nics" are ladies underpants.... :-P >>>>>> >>>>> Precisely. Now the question is why is Dan wearing ladies underpants! :- >>>>> >>>> you, Sir, are a ???? >>>> Did you READ what Dan wrote, or do you have comprehensive problems?? >>>> *DID* Dan say he *WEARS* nics?? show him where you read that! >>>> You can't. because he didn't say that... >>>> >>>> so now, Andrew, you may start a war with Dan on the new [OT] subject >>>> of "nics".... :-D > >> >>> Are you that dense - or just trying to be funny. If the former - >>> pathetic. If the later - not funny. The charge was that people who have >>> "champion" in their "nic" are exempt. I asked what a "nic" was. You >>> responded it was ladies underpants. So I joked that since Dan had >>> "champion" in his "nic", why was he wearing ladies underpants. This is >>> known as a joke or extending the joke you were making. It was also a jab >>> at Dan, who's one of my favorite targets, especially when he's got his >>> (excuse me) undies in a bunch like he has and acting irrational as he >>> clearly is. >> I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been >> spelled correctly in the first place. > > No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who > don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty > knickers") You don't expect people who can't spell "nick" to know how to spell "knickers", do you? :) -- Blinky RLU 297263 Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28 _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by The Real Bev
::
Rate this Message:
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> The Real Bev wrote: >> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>> >>> I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been >>> spelled correctly in the first place. >> >> No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who >> don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty >> knickers") > > You don't expect people who can't spell "nick" to know how to spell > "knickers", do you? :) No, Mr. Bond, I expect them to die! -- Cheers, Bev (Happy Linux User #85683, Slackware 11.0) ***************************************************** Nothing is so stupid that you can't find somebody who did it at least once if you look hard enough. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Rinaldi J. Montessi-4
::
Rate this Message:
The Real Bev wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: > >> The Real Bev wrote: >>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>>> >>>> I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been >>>> spelled correctly in the first place. >>> >>> No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who >>> don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty >>> knickers") >> >> You don't expect people who can't spell "nick" to know how to spell >> "knickers", do you? :) > > No, Mr. Bond, I expect them to die! A classic line :-) -- Mustgo, n.: Any item of food that has been sitting in the refrigerator so long it has become a science project. -- Sniglets, "Rich Hall & Friends" _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Blinky the Shark
::
Rate this Message:
The Real Bev wrote: > Blinky the Shark wrote: > >> The Real Bev wrote: >>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>>> I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been >>>> spelled correctly in the first place. >>> No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who >>> don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty >>> knickers") >> You don't expect people who can't spell "nick" to know how to spell >> "knickers", do you? :) > > No, Mr. Bond, I expect them to die! I wonder if anyone in here has a license to kill. Okay, how about a license to spell? -- Blinky RLU 297263 Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28 _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by squaredancer
::
Rate this Message:
On 01.09.2007 20:16, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Andrew DeFaria
to generate the following:? : > squaredancer wrote: >> On 01.09.2007 00:19, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Andrew >> DeFaria to generate the following:? : >>> On Aug 31, 3:46 am, squaredancer <squaredan...@...> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> "nics" are ladies underpants.... :-P >>>> >>> >>> Precisely. Now the question is why is Dan wearing ladies underpants! :- >>> P >>> >>> >> you, Sir, are a ???? >> Did you READ what Dan wrote, or do you have comprehensive problems?? >> *DID* Dan say he *WEARS* nics?? show him where you read that! >> You can't. because he didn't say that... >> >> so now, Andrew, you may start a war with Dan on the new [OT] subject >> of "nics".... :-D > Are you that dense - hmmmm - obviously, you don't recognise a mimicry of a "Dan, MozChamp man" offensive posting?? ah well - who's dense?? me?? naaaa! reg << snipped >> _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Phillip Jones-3
::
Rate this Message:
squaredancer wrote:
> On 01.09.2007 20:16, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Andrew DeFaria > to generate the following:? : >> squaredancer wrote: >>> On 01.09.2007 00:19, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Andrew >>> DeFaria to generate the following:? : >>>> On Aug 31, 3:46 am, squaredancer <squaredan...@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> "nics" are ladies underpants.... :-P >>>>> >>>> >>>> Precisely. Now the question is why is Dan wearing ladies underpants! :- >>>> P >>>> >>>> >>> you, Sir, are a ???? >>> Did you READ what Dan wrote, or do you have comprehensive problems?? >>> *DID* Dan say he *WEARS* nics?? show him where you read that! >>> You can't. because he didn't say that... >>> >>> so now, Andrew, you may start a war with Dan on the new [OT] subject >>> of "nics".... :-D >> Are you that dense - > > hmmmm - obviously, you don't recognise a mimicry of a "Dan, MozChamp > man" offensive posting?? > > ah well - who's dense?? me?? naaaa! > > reg > > << snipped >> -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phillip M. Jones, CET mailto:pjones@... If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! http://www.vpea.org http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by The Real Bev
::
Rate this Message:
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> > The Real Bev wrote: >> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>> The Real Bev wrote: >>>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>>>> I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been >>>>> spelled correctly in the first place. >>>> No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who >>>> don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty >>>> knickers") >>> You don't expect people who can't spell "nick" to know how to spell >>> "knickers", do you? :) >> >> No, Mr. Bond, I expect them to die! > > I wonder if anyone in here has a license to kill. In California that's called a 'Driver License'. The bad part is that I have to live with the same lousy photo (looks kind of like Woody Allen on a bad day) for another five years. > Okay, how about a license to spell? Sorry, we aren't issuing those any more. Nobody knows how to fill out the form, much less approve it. -- Cheers, Bev (Happy Linux User #85683, Slackware 11.0) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Why is it so hot and what am I doing in this handbasket? _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Rinaldi J. Montessi-4
::
Rate this Message:
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> > The Real Bev wrote: >> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> >>> The Real Bev wrote: >>>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>>>> I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been >>>>> spelled correctly in the first place. >>>> No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who >>>> don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty >>>> knickers") >>> You don't expect people who can't spell "nick" to know how to spell >>> "knickers", do you? :) >> >> No, Mr. Bond, I expect them to die! > > I wonder if anyone in here has a license to kill. Okay, how about a > license to spell? Licenses to kill would only apply to countries that have disarmed their citizens. I'm thinking Second Amendment and self defense, of course. -- "I have a very firm grasp on reality! I can reach out and strangle it any time!" _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Blinky the Shark
::
Rate this Message:
The Real Bev wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> Okay, how about a license to spell? > > Sorry, we aren't issuing those any more. Nobody knows how to fill out the > form, much less approve it. <AOL-GG> he he your right omg </AOL-GG> -- Blinky RLU 297263 Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28 _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
|
|
Re: AV program
by Blinky the Shark
::
Rate this Message:
Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote: > Blinky the Shark wrote: >> The Real Bev wrote: >>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>> >>>> The Real Bev wrote: >>>>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>>>>> I wonder if all this could've have been avoided if "nick" had been >>>>>> spelled correctly in the first place. >>>>> No way. Some people just have to argue about nothing, especially people who >>>>> don't realize that ladies' underpants are spelled with a k. (Ref: "Naughty >>>>> knickers") >>>> You don't expect people who can't spell "nick" to know how to spell >>>> "knickers", do you? :) >>> No, Mr. Bond, I expect them to die! >> I wonder if anyone in here has a license to kill. Okay, how about a >> license to spell? > > Licenses to kill would only apply to countries that have disarmed their > citizens. I'm thinking Second Amendment and self defense, of course. Well, we (US) are getting there. -- Blinky RLU 297263 Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28 _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@... https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
