Re: Accessing pre-existing data

Hey Alejandro.

2008/4/18, Alejandro Scandroli <alejandroscandroli@...>:
> Hi Daniel
>
>
>  > I am sorry, if you consider my questions inappropriate.
>
>
> No, please, you have have been very polite and concise. I really
>  appreciate that. If you thought I was considering them inappropriate I
>  have to blame my lack of good English skills. I'm sorry.

Please don't be sorry. There's absolutely no need. I wasn't sure, what
you meant, because I'm no native speaker as well, so the "error" just
summed up, I guess. :-)
Anyway: Now we're clear on that. Won't be a topic again.

>  Finally (to be completely honest)  one more thing to consider in your
>  evaluation.
>  The soon to be released 1.2 version of Trails is based in Tapestry 4.
>  There is a new Tapestry version, Tapestry 5, which is beautiful and
>  very fun to code with, but sadly It's not fully backward compatible
>  with Tapestry 4. That means that the next version of Trails (2.0?)
>  will have to be rewritten almost from scratch. IMO that's not a bad
>  thing at all, but that's something you need to know to consider in
>  your evaluation.

Thanks for that insider's view. I'll add it to my summary and thoughts.
We have a strong Tapestry antagonist in the department but also a
Tapestry protagonist (the hibernate guy).

>  Trails certainly needs some help in the documentation department so
>  I'm looking forward to your contributions.

I hope I didn't promise too much. I do not know, if Trails will be the
"winner", and if not I certainly won't have an opportunity to
contribute.
In private life I stick to script languages because the cheap web
hosters offer them for free ;-)

Best wishes,
Daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email