« Return to Thread: ActiveMQ JDBC Persistence with SQL Server

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC Persistence with SQL Server

by jcarreira :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

James.Strachan wrote:
Am not too sure what your XML looks like - but the peer: transport is
typically only used on the client side - there is no server side
transport for peer
Well, as per my original post (http://www.nabble.com/Getting-started-with-ActiveMQ-tf2004874.html) I'm trying to set it up so that I have independent cluster nodes which can be transparently dropped into the cluster and automatically discover each other. From the docs and what Hiram said, peer seemed like a good fit. If it's creating embedded brokers in each app, why is it client-side, not server side?

In any case, I'm setting it up using multicast discovery and a tcp port like it shows in the network of brokers example now.

Jason

 « Return to Thread: ActiveMQ JDBC Persistence with SQL Server