>
> So is there a workaround or a fix coming?
>
>
> James.Strachan wrote:
> >
> > This looks like the new SQL for the exclusive locks doesn't work for
> > SQL Server. (For more background see....
> >
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/jdbc-master-slave.html> >
> > We are basically doing a 'SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK FOR UPDATE"
> > which doesn't seem to be allowed for SQL Server despite being SQL 92
> > AFAIK..
> >
> > I wonder if there's some way to refactor the SQL to make it work
> > nicely on SQL Server - or we could maybe allow the exclusive lock to
> > be disabled.
> >
> > On 7/30/06, jcarreira <
jcarreira@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to get ActiveMQ working with SQL Server 2000 as the JDBC
> >> PersistanceAdapter, and I'm running into this error:
> >>
> >> 2006-07-29 21:30:32,887 [main] ERROR
> >> org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.DefaultDatabaseLocker - Failed to acquire
> >> lock: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Line 1: FOR UPDATE
> >> clause allowed only for DECLARE CURSOR.
> >> com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Line 1: FOR UPDATE
> >> clause
> >> allowed only for DECLARE CURSOR.
> >> at
> >> com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException.makeFromDatabaseError(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.IOBuffer.processPackets(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at
> >> com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerPreparedStatement.getPrepExecResponse(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at
> >> com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerPreparedStatement.doExecutePreparedStatement(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at
> >> com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerPreparedStatement$PreparedStatementExecutionRequest.executeStatement(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.CancelableRequest.execute(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at
> >> com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerConnection.executeRequest(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at
> >> com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerPreparedStatement.execute(Unknown
> >> Source)
> >> at
> >> com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewProxyPreparedStatement.execute(NewProxyPreparedStatement.java:911)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.DefaultDatabaseLocker.start(DefaultDatabaseLocker.java:56)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.JDBCPersistenceAdapter.start(JDBCPersistenceAdapter.java:172)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.activemq.store.journal.JournalPersistenceAdapter.start(JournalPersistenceAdapter.java:216)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.createRegionBroker(BrokerService.java:1006)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.createBroker(BrokerService.java:964)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.getBroker(BrokerService.java:460)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.start(BrokerService.java:363)
> >>
> >> I've gotten this exact same error with both jTDS 1.2 and Microsoft's JDBC
> >> Driver version 1.1.1320.0. Here's my activemq.xml:
> >>
> >> <amq:broker brokerName="cluster" useJmx="true">
> >> <!-- Use the following to set the broker memory limit (in bytes)
> >> -->
> >> <amq:memoryManager>
> >> <amq:usageManager limit="1048576"/>
> >> </amq:memoryManager>
> >> <amq:persistenceAdapter>
> >> <amq:journaledJDBC journalLogFiles="5"
> >> journalLogFileSize="32768"
> >> dataDirectory="${java.io.tmpdir}/amq-data"
> >> dataSource="#dataSource"
> >> >
> >> <amq:adapter><amq:imageBasedJDBCAdaptor/></amq:adapter>
> >> </amq:journaledJDBC>
> >> </amq:persistenceAdapter>
> >> <amq:transportConnectors>
> >> <amq:transportConnector uri="peer://nirvana-dev"/>
> >> </amq:transportConnectors>
> >> </amq:broker>
> >>
> >> My DataSource is a c3p0 datasource set up like this:
> >>
> >> <bean id="dataSource" class="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataSource">
> >> <property name="driverClass" value="${jdbc.driverClassName}"/>
> >> <property name="jdbcUrl" value="${jdbc.url}"/>
> >> <property name="user" value="${jdbc.username}"/>
> >> <property name="password" value="${jdbc.password}"/>
> >> <property name="initialPoolSize"
> >> value="${connectionpool.initialPoolSize}"/>
> >> <property name="minPoolSize" value="${connectionpool.minSize}"/>
> >> <property name="maxPoolSize" value="${connectionpool.maxSize}"/>
> >> ...
> >> </bean>
> >>
> >> Anyone have any ideas?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-JDBC-Persistence-with-SQL-Server-tf2022248.html#a5560296> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> >
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/> >
> >
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-JDBC-Persistence-with-SQL-Server-tf2022248.html#a5577924> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>