Hello Mr Steve
Glad that there is someone who is doing the same thing there :)
Your idea of 'cheating' ALICE was great. I just realized that actually
ALICE is not conscious, right? She is not truly 'understanding' what
she said. So it doesn't matter if the warning message sent while she
doesn't notice it. The more important thing here is: the user received
the warning message.
Mr Gary's idea for sending message to the bot on periodic time is also
interesting. But i think it would add a little load to the system.
Especially if the period is short.
That's just my opinion :)
Regards,
Ariyo
2008/5/25, Steve Prior <
sprior@...>:
> I was thinking about the same sort of problem, then realized there was an
> easier
> solution. I've got a home automation system and wanted to be able to
> control it
> using a chat style interface and thought Alicebot would be a great addition.
>
> What I ended up doing was to write my own limited natural language interface
> that was capable of handling queries and controls for the HA system (I wrote
> it
> in SWI-Prolog), but if my own system couldn't parse the input I then passed
> it
> to Alicebot through the HTTP interface for a response. This is kind of a
> cheat,
> but it provides a depth to the interface even though in effect Alicebot is
> only
> providing cute error messages - some of the responses have surprised me at
> times.
>
> So your device could send out that "device is gonna blow" message on its own
> and
> Alicebot would only be involved when there was an input from the user.
>
> Steve
_______________________________________________
alicebot-developer mailing list
alicebot-developer@...
http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-developer