Re: Annotations, inner classes and set && withincode

> Because your 'count' field is private, the inner type cannot directly
> see it and must go through an accessor generated by the compiler (this
> is nothing to do with AspectJ, this is how java compilers tend to work).
>
> If you javap the App class you will see, javap -private foo.App
>
> public class foo.App extends java.lang.Object{
>     private int count;
>     public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
>     public foo.App();
>     private void doSomething();
>     static void access$0(foo.App, int);
> }
>
> That final method 'access$0' is used to write a value into the field.  
> The join point 'set(int foo.App.count)' actually occurs within the code
> of the accessor, not within your innerDoSomething().  If we look inside
> innerDoSomething() we can see it delegate to the accessor:
>
>   Code:
>    Stack=2, Locals=1, Args_size=1
>    0:   getstatic       #21; //Field
> java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
>    3:   ldc     #27; //String >> before
>    5:   invokevirtual   #29; //Method
> java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
>    8:   aload_0
>    9:   getfield        #10; //Field this$0:Lfoo/App;
>    12:  bipush  25
>    14:  invokestatic    #35; //Method foo/App.access$0:(Lfoo/App;I)V
>    17:  getstatic       #21; //Field
> java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
>    20:  ldc     #41; //String >> after
>    22:  invokevirtual   #29; //Method
> java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
>    25:  return
>
> in the middle you see the load up of 25 and then a call to the accessor.
>
> If you make the count field anything other than private, your code will
> match fine as the accessor is not required
>
>
> Andy
>
> 2009/6/17 Captain Haddock <davidg@... <mailto:davidg@...>>
>
>     Can't seem to get a pointcut to work on a setter that is within a
>     method of an inner class.
>
>     A pointcut on the outer class works fine (see "doSomething").
>
>     Also a pointcut of just the "set" or just the "within" works fine,
>     just not the && of the two.
>
>     Any thoughts?
>
>     thx in advance, Haddock
>
>     package foo;
>     public class App
>     {
>        private int count;
>
>        public static void main( String[] args )
>        {
>            try {
>                App app = new App();
>                app.doSomething();
>            } catch (Exception e) {
>                e.printStackTrace();
>            }
>
>            System.exit(1);
>        }
>
>        public App() {
>        }
>
>        private void doSomething() {
>            System.out.println("> before");
>            count = 30;
>            System.out.println("> after");
>            new App.Inner().innerDoSomething();
>        }
>
>        private class Inner {
>            private void innerDoSomething() {
>                System.out.println(">> before");
>                count = 25;
>                System.out.println(">> after");
>            }
>        }
>     }
>
>     package aspects;
>     @Aspect
>     public class LoggingAspect {
>        @Pointcut("set(int foo.App.count) && withincode(void
>     foo.App.doSomething())")
>        void doSomething() {}
>
>        @Before("doSomething()")
>        public void logDoSomething() {
>            System.out.println("doSomething()");
>        }
>
>        @Pointcut("set(int foo.App.count) && withincode(void
>     foo.App.Inner.innerDoSomething())")
>        void innerDoSomething() {}
>
>        @Before("innerDoSomething()")
>        public void logInnerDoSomething() {
>            System.out.println("innerDoSomething()");
>        }
>     }
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     aspectj-users mailing list
>     aspectj-users@... <mailto:aspectj-users@...>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@...
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users