----Original Message----
From:
boost-bounces@...
[mailto:
boost-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Janek Kozicki Sent:
23 May 2007 06:44 To:
boost@...
Subject: Re: [boost] Any libraries now not under the Boost Software
License?
> Rene Rivera said: (by the date of Tue, 22 May 2007 23:41:39 -0500)
>
>> Janek Kozicki wrote:
>>> David Abrahams said: (by the date of Tue, 22 May 2007 17:16:28
>>> -0400)
>>>
>>>> Is that still true now that we have Threads under the BSL?
>>>
>>> yes. I remember a post a while ago that the original author decided
>>> to relicense threads to BSL.
>>
>> I think you just answered with a non-answer ;-)
>
>
> OK, I'm sorry too much haste. I took time to grep my archive, and
> then google it in webarchive by title:
>
> "Permission given to change to Boost.License"
>
>
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/09/110143.php>
> But I see, the question was "Is that STILL true" ...
>
> well I don't know if it's still true. I pay some attention to thread
> related posts on this list, and since that one post I remember nothing
> about revoking this permission.
You have misunderstood the question completely. It is not:
Is Threads under the BSL?
(we know the answer to that is "Yes".)
The question is:
Are there any /other/ libraries that are not under the BSL?
If the answer to that question is "No", then the statement:
Currently, some Boost libraries have their own licenses.
is obviously false, and we can tidy up the licensing page (which will
make some corporate lawyers happy).
--
Martin Bonner
Project Leader
PI SHURLOK LTD
Telephone: +44 1223 441434 / 203894 (direct)
Fax: +44 1223 203999
Email:
martin.bonner@...
www.pi-shurlok.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
