http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/diff/7/scm/output-lib.scmFile scm/output-lib.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/diff/7/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode437scm/output-lib.scm:437: (let* ((height (ly:grob-pure-height grob grob 0
10000000))
On 2012/03/21 07:05:50, MikeSol wrote:
> On 2012/03/21 05:58:42, Keith wrote:
> > The C code uses INT_MAX to represent the end of the whole score, so
it would
> be
> > nice to use the same here, if possible.
> There'd have to be a constant defined for INT_MAX in guile. I believe
that
> INT_MAX can change between computers (not sure if it's the compiler or
system
> that does this). Probably worth doing in a separate commit where
INT-MAX is
> defined in the same place as all of the PI constants and then plugged
anywhere
> where there's a large integer.
INT_MAX would be a stupid constant to use in Scheme since it rather
certainly does not fit in a single cell and thus does not have an
efficient representation.
If we need such a thing, we should pick an arbitrary large constant that
is large enough to do the job and small enough not to trigger multi-cell
representations in any Guile implementation.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@...
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
