« Return to Thread: Barcodes missing checksum digit
Re: Barcodes missing checksum digit
by Brant Gibbard
::
Rate this Message:
I would be inclined to add two release events, one with each EAN, and add an
annotation explaining the issue. This is what I do in the case of a disc
that has more than one catalogue number printed right on its surface, or is
a disc in a boxed set, with one number on the outside packaging of the box,
and another number on the surface of the individual disc.
Brant Gibbard
Toronto, ON
http://bgibbard.ca
> -----Original Message-----
> From: musicbrainz-users-bounces@...
> [mailto:musicbrainz-users-bounces@...] On
> Behalf Of Aurélien Mino
> Sent: February-21-09 1:06 PM
> To: General discussions about MusicBrainz
> Subject: [mb-users] Barcodes missing checksum digit
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know opinions on how we should handle barcode
> for releases which have an invalid transcribed barcode.
>
> Example:
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/cf2439be-e928-47da-b260-64c072c
> 70282.html
> (see scanned back cover:
> http://jarremuseum.online.fr/revoluti/837421-2/version1/back.jpg).
> The human readable barcode is "4228374212", which is not a
> valid barcode per say: it misses the last checksum digit "3"
> and the leading 0.
> However if you use a barcode reader, you'll get "042283742123".
>
> Another example is
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/12914d15-dfec-48ed-af2c-88dbaa8
> 30ec0.html.
> I got the complete barcode from Amazon, but it seems that the
> checksum digit doesn't appear on back cover:
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=10075712 and
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=10130431
>
> So either we:
> 1. Kept what is written on the back cover ("4228374212") 2.
> Or save the correct barcode ("042283742123") in database,
> which can be retrieved e.g. with
> http://users.musicbrainz.org/~luks/ean.html from the
> incomplete barcode.
>
> I would go for solution #2, since otherwise the barcode
> information won't be computer-usable. I'm thinking about
> people using a barcode reader on the release, e.g. libraries.
>
> - Aurélien / murdos
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users@...
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
annotation explaining the issue. This is what I do in the case of a disc
that has more than one catalogue number printed right on its surface, or is
a disc in a boxed set, with one number on the outside packaging of the box,
and another number on the surface of the individual disc.
Brant Gibbard
Toronto, ON
http://bgibbard.ca
> -----Original Message-----
> From: musicbrainz-users-bounces@...
> [mailto:musicbrainz-users-bounces@...] On
> Behalf Of Aurélien Mino
> Sent: February-21-09 1:06 PM
> To: General discussions about MusicBrainz
> Subject: [mb-users] Barcodes missing checksum digit
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know opinions on how we should handle barcode
> for releases which have an invalid transcribed barcode.
>
> Example:
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/cf2439be-e928-47da-b260-64c072c
> 70282.html
> (see scanned back cover:
> http://jarremuseum.online.fr/revoluti/837421-2/version1/back.jpg).
> The human readable barcode is "4228374212", which is not a
> valid barcode per say: it misses the last checksum digit "3"
> and the leading 0.
> However if you use a barcode reader, you'll get "042283742123".
>
> Another example is
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/12914d15-dfec-48ed-af2c-88dbaa8
> 30ec0.html.
> I got the complete barcode from Amazon, but it seems that the
> checksum digit doesn't appear on back cover:
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=10075712 and
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=10130431
>
> So either we:
> 1. Kept what is written on the back cover ("4228374212") 2.
> Or save the correct barcode ("042283742123") in database,
> which can be retrieved e.g. with
> http://users.musicbrainz.org/~luks/ean.html from the
> incomplete barcode.
>
> I would go for solution #2, since otherwise the barcode
> information won't be computer-usable. I'm thinking about
> people using a barcode reader on the release, e.g. libraries.
>
> - Aurélien / murdos
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users@...
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
« Return to Thread: Barcodes missing checksum digit
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
