« Return to Thread: Barcodes missing checksum digit

Re: Barcodes missing checksum digit

by chabreyflint :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

I don't think adding two release events makes sense: it's not like for box sets where you have two different barcodes. Here's one and the same barcode, with the one printed on the cover being incomplete and thus invalid. I'd go for solution #2 – eventually, to refrain people with disc in hand from making wrong "corrections" – with a annotation: "Incomplete barcode on back cover of disc completed"

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Brant Gibbard <bgibbard@...> wrote:
I would be inclined to add two release events, one with each EAN, and add an
annotation explaining the issue. This is what I do in the case of a disc
that has more than one catalogue number printed right on its surface, or is
a disc in a boxed set, with one number on the outside packaging of the box,
and another number on the surface of the individual disc.

Brant Gibbard
Toronto, ON
http://bgibbard.ca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: musicbrainz-users-bounces@...
> [mailto:musicbrainz-users-bounces@...] On
> Behalf Of Aurélien Mino
> Sent: February-21-09 1:06 PM
> To: General discussions about MusicBrainz
> Subject: [mb-users] Barcodes missing checksum digit
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know opinions on how we should handle barcode
> for releases which have an invalid transcribed barcode.
>
> Example:
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/cf2439be-e928-47da-b260-64c072c
> 70282.html
> (see scanned back cover:
> http://jarremuseum.online.fr/revoluti/837421-2/version1/back.jpg).
> The human readable barcode is "4228374212", which is not a
> valid barcode per say: it misses the last checksum digit "3"
> and the leading 0.
> However if you use a barcode reader, you'll get "042283742123".
>
> Another example is
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/12914d15-dfec-48ed-af2c-88dbaa8
> 30ec0.html.
> I got the complete barcode from Amazon, but it seems that the
> checksum digit doesn't appear on back cover:
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=10075712 and
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=10130431
>
> So either we:
> 1. Kept what is written on the back cover ("4228374212") 2.
> Or save the correct barcode ("042283742123") in database,
> which can be retrieved e.g. with
> http://users.musicbrainz.org/~luks/ean.html from the
> incomplete barcode.
>
> I would go for solution #2, since otherwise the barcode
> information won't be computer-usable. I'm thinking about
> people using a barcode reader on the release, e.g. libraries.
>
> - Aurélien / murdos
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users@...
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users


_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users


_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users

 « Return to Thread: Barcodes missing checksum digit