> A little more indepth examination, and I can see VIM's wait is approximately
> double of what the readline patch's wait time is. However, I think the shorter
> wait time is more functional as when typing a double char, it in no way takes
> as long as VIM's wait time unless you type the same char with your finger and
> then use a toe to type the second char.
> Matter of fact, I'm starting to find VIM's long wait time length a little
> annoying. ;-)
> Great job at guessing the wait time!