Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

View: New views

8 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Simon Walter :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hello "George B." <i93.borg@...> writes: > The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release > (Lenny). :-( Mailscanner was removed from stable because of #506353[1]. > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it didn't made it into the last stable release? "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) Thanks! -- Regards Simon Walter [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506353 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Philipp Kern-6 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: > > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? > I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it > didn't made it into the last stable release? > "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... > Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) No, sorry. No new packages. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:phil@... Stable Release Manager `- finger pkern/key@... signature.asc (204 bytes) Download Attachment
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Lupe Christoph :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: > > > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? > > I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it > > didn't made it into the last stable release? > > "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... > > Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) > No, sorry. No new packages. For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Liupe Christoph -- \| There is no substitute for bad design except worse design. \| \| /me \| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by George B. :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> No, sorry. No new packages. Makes sense. > For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? Thanks, George. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Simon Walter :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: >> > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? >> I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it >> didn't made it into the last stable release? >> "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... >> Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) > > No, sorry. No new packages. It's not new since it was in in etch and even in sarge... So it would be new to fresh lenny installations, but for people using it in etch it would be an update... I don't think this change anything just wanted to mention it. ;) -- Regards Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Lupe Christoph :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +0000, George B. wrote: > 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > > For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is there, though. Why don't you just ask on the backports-users mailing list? I;m not familiar with the way packages are selected for backports. I use them if they are available, otherwise I build my own. Lupe Christoph -- \| There is no substitute for bad design except worse design. \| \| /me \| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +0000, George B. wrote: >> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > >>> For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > >> Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? > > They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is there, > though. Why don't you just ask on the backports-users mailing list? I;m > not familiar with the way packages are selected for backports. I use > them if they are available, otherwise I build my own. Joerg announced that lenny-backports is already working. To upload to backports.org you need to be a Debian Developer and request your key to be added to the backports.org keyring, if you aren't a DD you'll have to look for a package sponsor. As long as the package is in "testing" it is accepted in backports.org, that's the "Rule of Thumb". Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmbJxwACgkQCjAO0JDlykbGIACbBpsSAHKe2Sv0feZF16sRpr74 w/AAn1afR/CsmltfHS3mY9pcyNSS3PK9 =QHkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Alexander Wirt-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) schrieb am Tuesday, den 17. February 2009: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +0000, George B. wrote: > >> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > > > >>> For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > > > >> Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? > > > > They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is there, > > though. Why don't you just ask on the backports-users mailing list? I;m > > not familiar with the way packages are selected for backports. I use > > them if they are available, otherwise I build my own. > > Joerg announced that lenny-backports is already working. To > upload to backports.org you need to be a Debian Developer and request > your key to be added to the backports.org keyring, if you aren't a DD > you'll have to look for a package sponsor. Its technically working but not approved by me. Expect an announcement tomorrow that lenny-bpo is free for upload. Alex - backports ftp-master. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Simon Walter :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hello "George B." <i93.borg@...> writes: > The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release > (Lenny). :-( Mailscanner was removed from stable because of #506353[1]. > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it didn't made it into the last stable release? "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) Thanks! -- Regards Simon Walter [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506353 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Philipp Kern-6 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: > > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? > I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it > didn't made it into the last stable release? > "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... > Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) No, sorry. No new packages. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:phil@... Stable Release Manager `- finger pkern/key@... signature.asc (204 bytes) Download Attachment
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Lupe Christoph :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: > > > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? > > I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it > > didn't made it into the last stable release? > > "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... > > Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) > No, sorry. No new packages. For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Liupe Christoph -- \| There is no substitute for bad design except worse design. \| \| /me \| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by George B. :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> No, sorry. No new packages. Makes sense. > For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? Thanks, George. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Simon Walter :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: >> > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? >> I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it >> didn't made it into the last stable release? >> "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... >> Can someone from the volatile team enlight us? ;) > > No, sorry. No new packages. It's not new since it was in in etch and even in sarge... So it would be new to fresh lenny installations, but for people using it in etch it would be an update... I don't think this change anything just wanted to mention it. ;) -- Regards Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Lupe Christoph :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +0000, George B. wrote: > 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > > For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is there, though. Why don't you just ask on the backports-users mailing list? I;m not familiar with the way packages are selected for backports. I use them if they are available, otherwise I build my own. Lupe Christoph -- \| There is no substitute for bad design except worse design. \| \| /me \| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +0000, George B. wrote: >> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > >>> For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > >> Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? > > They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is there, > though. Why don't you just ask on the backports-users mailing list? I;m > not familiar with the way packages are selected for backports. I use > them if they are available, otherwise I build my own. Joerg announced that lenny-backports is already working. To upload to backports.org you need to be a Debian Developer and request your key to be added to the backports.org keyring, if you aren't a DD you'll have to look for a package sponsor. As long as the package is in "testing" it is accepted in backports.org, that's the "Rule of Thumb". Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmbJxwACgkQCjAO0JDlykbGIACbBpsSAHKe2Sv0feZF16sRpr74 w/AAn1afR/CsmltfHS3mY9pcyNSS3PK9 =QHkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile by Alexander Wirt-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) schrieb am Tuesday, den 17. February 2009: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +0000, George B. wrote: > >> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph <lupe@...>: > > > >>> For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > > > >> Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? > > > > They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is there, > > though. Why don't you just ask on the backports-users mailing list? I;m > > not familiar with the way packages are selected for backports. I use > > them if they are available, otherwise I build my own. > > Joerg announced that lenny-backports is already working. To > upload to backports.org you need to be a Debian Developer and request > your key to be added to the backports.org keyring, if you aren't a DD > you'll have to look for a package sponsor. Its technically working but not approved by me. Expect an announcement tomorrow that lenny-bpo is free for upload. Alex - backports ftp-master. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-volatile-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...