Re: Bug#532447: xulrunner_1.9.0.10-1(alpha/unstable): FTBFS on alpha - test failure

[Andreas Barth]

[Ccing d-alpha now]

* Mike Hommey (mh@...) [090719 09:22]:

> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:56:09AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:27 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >
> > > Just given back on alpha. Lets see if it helps.
> >
> > Doesn't look like it did. The version in experimental seems to build on
> > alpha though:
> >
> > http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=xulrunner&ver=1.9.1.1-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1247941851&file=log&as=raw
>
> But the previous version, 1.9.1-1, failed, and there is really no
> difference in 1.9.1.1-1 that would explain that.
>
> On the other hand, 1.9.1-1 was built with:
> Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-13 g++-4.3_4.3.3-13
> gcc-4.3_4.3.3-13 binutils_2.19.1-1 libstdc++6_4.4.0-10
> libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.3-13
>
> while 1.9.1.1-1 was built with:
> Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-13 g++-4.3_4.3.3-14
> gcc-4.3_4.3.3-14 binutils_2.19.1-1 libstdc++6_4.4.0-11
> libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.3-14
>
> Maybe this made the difference.

Any news on this bug report?


Alpha-porters, could you perhaps help here?



Cheers,
Andi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Paul Wise-3]

On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 14:20 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:

> > But the previous version, 1.9.1-1, failed, and there is really no
> > difference in 1.9.1.1-1 that would explain that.
> >
> > On the other hand, 1.9.1-1 was built with:
> > Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-13 g++-4.3_4.3.3-13
> > gcc-4.3_4.3.3-13 binutils_2.19.1-1 libstdc++6_4.4.0-10
> > libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.3-13
> >
> > while 1.9.1.1-1 was built with:
> > Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-13 g++-4.3_4.3.3-14
> > gcc-4.3_4.3.3-14 binutils_2.19.1-1 libstdc++6_4.4.0-11
> > libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.3-14
> >
> > Maybe this made the difference.
>
> Any news on this bug report?
>
> Alpha-porters, could you perhaps help here?

It appears the main difference between failure and success in the
experimental buildds was gcc-4.3 4.3.3-13 vs 4.3.3-14. Since gcc-4.3 has
had an update since then to a new release-candidate, perhaps a give-back
on alpha will fix this issue if the buildd chroots have been updated?

--
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

[Andreas Barth]

* Paul Wise (pabs@...) [090819 15:28]:
> It appears the main difference between failure and success in the
> experimental buildds was gcc-4.3 4.3.3-13 vs 4.3.3-14. Since gcc-4.3 has
> had an update since then to a new release-candidate, perhaps a give-back
> on alpha will fix this issue if the buildd chroots have been updated?

done so. Let's see what the outcome is.


Cheers,
Andi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Arthur Loiret-4]

It seems I gave-it back too, at the same time, hadn't seen your mail yet ... :-)

2009/8/19, Andreas Barth <aba@...>:

> * Paul Wise (pabs@...) [090819 15:28]:
>> It appears the main difference between failure and success in the
>> experimental buildds was gcc-4.3 4.3.3-13 vs 4.3.3-14. Since gcc-4.3 has
>> had an update since then to a new release-candidate, perhaps a give-back
>> on alpha will fix this issue if the buildd chroots have been updated?
>
> done so. Let's see what the outcome is.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@...
>
>

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Andreas Barth]

* Arthur Loiret (aloiret@...) [090819 16:02]:
> It seems I gave-it back too, at the same time, hadn't seen your mail yet ... :-)

now it builds again. Good.



Cheers,
Andi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Mike Hommey]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:03:29PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Arthur Loiret (aloiret@...) [090819 16:02]:
> > It seems I gave-it back too, at the same time, hadn't seen your mail yet ... :-)
>
> now it builds again. Good.

Still failed :(

Mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Mike Hommey]

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:17:51AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:03:29PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Arthur Loiret (aloiret@...) [090819 16:02]:
> > > It seems I gave-it back too, at the same time, hadn't seen your mail yet ... :-)
> >
> > now it builds again. Good.
>
> Still failed :(

The experimental buildds doesn't fail, though with newer upstream
xulrunner, using this toolchain:
Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-26 linux-libc-dev_2.6.30-6
g++-4.3_4.3.4-2 gcc-4.3_4.3.4-2 binutils_2.19.51.20090827-1
libstdc++6_4.4.1-3 libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.4-2

Could someone try to update the unstable alpha buildds ?

Mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:05:33AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:17:51AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:03:29PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Arthur Loiret (aloiret@...) [090819 16:02]:
> > > > It seems I gave-it back too, at the same time, hadn't seen your mail yet ... :-)
> > >
> > > now it builds again. Good.
> >
> > Still failed :(
>
> The experimental buildds doesn't fail, though with newer upstream
> xulrunner, using this toolchain:
> Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-26 linux-libc-dev_2.6.30-6
> g++-4.3_4.3.4-2 gcc-4.3_4.3.4-2 binutils_2.19.51.20090827-1
> libstdc++6_4.4.1-3 libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.4-2
>
> Could someone try to update the unstable alpha buildds ?

I've tried giving back the latest xulrunner again a few hours ago,
and it failed again.  The chroot has been updated a few days ago,
and nothing of the toolchain seems to have been updated since.


Kurt


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...