Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

[Andreas Tille-5]

Hi Bas,

sorry for the full quote but I want to keep Debian Med in the queue.

Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance
following Debian Med group policy[1]?  BTW, the policy is not fully up
to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository.

To the Debian Med team: Independently from Bas's answer: to which task
do we want to add this (prospective) package?  I wonder whether it is
just "tools" or if it better fits into "practice" as well as perhaps
"psychology" (mentioning in more than one task is fine as well).

What do you think?

Kind regards

     Andreas.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:32:50AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:

> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@...>
>
> * Package name    : edfbrowser
>   Version         : 115
>   Upstream Author : Teunis van Beelen <teuniz@...>
> * URL             : http://www.teuniz.net/edfbrowser/
> * License         : GPLv2
>   Programming Lang: C++
>   Description     : a viewer for medical timeseries storage files
>
> EDFbrowser is a viewer for medical timeseries storage files containing
> data such as EEG, EMG, and ECG signals.  It supports EDF(+) and BDF(+)
> file formats.  
> Apart from viewing the files, it can also convert the biomedical files
> to other formats.
>

[1] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html

--
http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Karsten Hilbert]

IMO both practice and tools seem to fit.

Karsten

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:09:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Subject: Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical
>  timeseries
> storage files
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
>
> Hi Bas,
>
> sorry for the full quote but I want to keep Debian Med in the queue.
>
> Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance
> following Debian Med group policy[1]?  BTW, the policy is not fully up
> to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository.
>
> To the Debian Med team: Independently from Bas's answer: to which task
> do we want to add this (prospective) package?  I wonder whether it is
> just "tools" or if it better fits into "practice" as well as perhaps
> "psychology" (mentioning in more than one task is fine as well).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Kind regards
>
>      Andreas.
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:32:50AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@...>
> >
> > * Package name    : edfbrowser
> >   Version         : 115
> >   Upstream Author : Teunis van Beelen <teuniz@...>
> > * URL             : http://www.teuniz.net/edfbrowser/
> > * License         : GPLv2
> >   Programming Lang: C++
> >   Description     : a viewer for medical timeseries storage files
> >
> > EDFbrowser is a viewer for medical timeseries storage files containing
> > data such as EEG, EMG, and ECG signals.  It supports EDF(+) and BDF(+)
> > file formats.  
> > Apart from viewing the files, it can also convert the biomedical files
> > to other formats.
> >
>
> [1] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@...
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Bas Zoetekouw]

Hi Andreas!

You wrote:

> Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance
> following Debian Med group policy[1]?  BTW, the policy is not fully up
> to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository.

Sure, that's fine with me.  If you can add me to the debian-med group,
I'll put the packaging stuff there.

> To the Debian Med team: Independently from Bas's answer: to which task
> do we want to add this (prospective) package?  I wonder whether it is
> just "tools" or if it better fits into "practice" as well as perhaps
> "psychology" (mentioning in more than one task is fine as well).

I'd say "tools".  The edfbrowser really is just a program to view
biosignal recordings, so "practice" doesn't really fit, and although of
course cognitive psychologists might use the package, it's not limited
to pure pyschology.

Bas.

--
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw      | Sweet day, so cool, so calm, so bright, |
|--------------------| The bridall of the earth and skie:      |
| bas@...  | The dew shall weep thy fall tonight;    |
+--------------------|                    For thou must die.   |
                     +-----------------------------------------+


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...