On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jeffrey Bosboom<
jbosboom@...> wrote:
>
> I think the solution might be to have a process where libraries that sit
> unmaintained for some period of time can be adopted by someone else. (Not
> that people necessarily want to do maintain someone's library, but if
> someone using the library is applying patches on their local copy anyway,
> maybe they'd like to be the maintainer.)
>
> --Jeffrey Bosboom
Small question possibly big discussion:
Do all libraries need a specific maintainer?
Tony
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
