« Return to Thread: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by tleveque
::
Rate this Message:
Thanks, but I was not talking about using the submit behavior.
I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the value
of multiple form fields.
I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I encounter
this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but this time I am stuck.
There should be a simple way to create an ajax behavior that will send the
values from the form components we want. Maybe with the option to validate
them or not.
What do you think?
Thierry
2009/7/7 Stefan Malmesjö <s.m.mogul@...>
> I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at
> least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on a
> textfield that is required, I don't really know.
>
> Maybe that path is too complicated.
>
> /Stefan
>
> On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote:
>
>> Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form has
>> been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work?
>>
>> /Stefan
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@...<mailto:
>> tleveque@...>> wrote:
>>
>> Any following on that?
>>
>> Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote
>> your own
>> behavior?
>>
>> I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick
>> way to
>> solve my problem.
>>
>> Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax
>> behavior?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg
>> <igor.vaynberg@... <mailto:igor.vaynberg@...>> wrote:
>>
>> > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use
>> > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :)
>> >
>> > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple
>> > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to
>> > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access
>> to the
>> > raw values.
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez
>> > <dfernandez@...
>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I
>> would really
>> > need
>> > > type conversion in this case.
>> > >
>> > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI:
>> > >
>> > > |OPERATOR |V|
>> > >
>> > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" |
>> > >
>> > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and
>> INPUT2 two
>> > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and
>> INPUT2 are
>> > > required (when they are visible, of course).
>> > >
>> > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change,
>> hiding INPUT1
>> > and
>> > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have
>> the same
>> > > contents that were on INPUT1 before:
>> > >
>> > > |OPERATOR |V|
>> > >
>> > > |INPUT3="aBc" |
>> > >
>> > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read
>> the value
>> > from
>> > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will
>> receive a
>> > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it
>> is, but I
>> > just
>> > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit
>> the form, and
>> > > not now that I am only changing the operator.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Daniel.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > igor.vaynberg wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot
>> access
>> > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also
>> planning
>> > >> on doing type conversion yourself then?
>> > >>
>> > >> -igor
>> > >>
>> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@...
>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>>:
>>
>> > >>> Hello,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange"
>> event I want
>> > to
>> > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from
>> other fields
>> > of
>> > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an
>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the
>> > >>> DropDownChoice.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from
>> the other
>> > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other
>> components...
>> > but
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the
>> form data,
>> > but
>> > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation
>> > messages
>> > >>> to
>> > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down).
>> > >>>
>> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just
>> > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything
>> like that in
>> > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior...
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Is there a way to do this?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards,
>> > >>> Daniel.
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...>
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> <mailto:users-help@...>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > View this message in context:
>> >
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html
>> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> <mailto:users-help@...>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> <mailto:users-help@...>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the value
of multiple form fields.
I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I encounter
this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but this time I am stuck.
There should be a simple way to create an ajax behavior that will send the
values from the form components we want. Maybe with the option to validate
them or not.
What do you think?
Thierry
2009/7/7 Stefan Malmesjö <s.m.mogul@...>
> I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at
> least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on a
> textfield that is required, I don't really know.
>
> Maybe that path is too complicated.
>
> /Stefan
>
> On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote:
>
>> Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form has
>> been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work?
>>
>> /Stefan
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@...<mailto:
>> tleveque@...>> wrote:
>>
>> Any following on that?
>>
>> Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote
>> your own
>> behavior?
>>
>> I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick
>> way to
>> solve my problem.
>>
>> Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax
>> behavior?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg
>> <igor.vaynberg@... <mailto:igor.vaynberg@...>> wrote:
>>
>> > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use
>> > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :)
>> >
>> > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple
>> > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to
>> > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access
>> to the
>> > raw values.
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez
>> > <dfernandez@...
>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I
>> would really
>> > need
>> > > type conversion in this case.
>> > >
>> > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI:
>> > >
>> > > |OPERATOR |V|
>> > >
>> > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" |
>> > >
>> > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and
>> INPUT2 two
>> > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and
>> INPUT2 are
>> > > required (when they are visible, of course).
>> > >
>> > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change,
>> hiding INPUT1
>> > and
>> > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have
>> the same
>> > > contents that were on INPUT1 before:
>> > >
>> > > |OPERATOR |V|
>> > >
>> > > |INPUT3="aBc" |
>> > >
>> > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read
>> the value
>> > from
>> > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will
>> receive a
>> > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it
>> is, but I
>> > just
>> > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit
>> the form, and
>> > > not now that I am only changing the operator.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Daniel.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > igor.vaynberg wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot
>> access
>> > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also
>> planning
>> > >> on doing type conversion yourself then?
>> > >>
>> > >> -igor
>> > >>
>> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@...
>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>>:
>>
>> > >>> Hello,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange"
>> event I want
>> > to
>> > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from
>> other fields
>> > of
>> > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an
>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the
>> > >>> DropDownChoice.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from
>> the other
>> > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other
>> components...
>> > but
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the
>> form data,
>> > but
>> > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation
>> > messages
>> > >>> to
>> > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down).
>> > >>>
>> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just
>> > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything
>> like that in
>> > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior...
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Is there a way to do this?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards,
>> > >>> Daniel.
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...>
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> <mailto:users-help@...>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > View this message in context:
>> >
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html
>> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> <mailto:users-help@...>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> <mailto:users-help@...>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
« Return to Thread: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
