Re: Change in behavior of maven-archetype-plugin

> Sorry,
>
> you can see in the sources
> in the first comment of the archetype-descriptor-new.xml in
> the archetypeng-archetype-descriptor project.
>
> It has been commented in the "plugin proposition" mail thread.
>
> I copy here:
>         <archetype id="archetype-artifact-id" partial="true|false" >
>            <requiredProperties>
>                <requiredProperty key="propKey" defaultValue="string to
> replace" />
>            </requiredProperties>
>            <fileSets>
>                <fileSet filtered="true|false" packaged="true|false" />
>                    <directory>src/main/java</directory>
>                    <includes>
>                        <include>**/*.java</include>
>                    </includes>
>                    <excludes>
>                        <exclude>Main.java</exclude>
>                    </excludes>
>                </fileSet>
>            </file-sets>
>            <modules>
>                <module id="module-artifact-id">
>                    <fileSets/>
>                    <modules/>
>                </module>
>            </modules>
>         </archetype>
>
> 2007/4/15, Franz Allan Valencia See <franz.see@...>:
> > Btw, what is the proposed new descriptor format? :-)
> >
> > On 4/13/07, Raphaël Piéroni <raphaelpieroni@...> wrote:
> > > 2007/4/9, Jason van Zyl <jason@...>:
> > > >
> > > > On 8 Apr 07, at 10:41 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It seems apparent now that we should push forward with the ng
> > > > > stuff. I was going to test if it is at least equivalent to trunk
> > > > > and then propose bringing it in to replace trunk and start to plan
> > > > > out 1.0 from there.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't work the same yet, the mojos are just stubbed out and I
> > > > have yet to get it to create an archetype though the tests are pretty
> > > > good so far.
> > >
> > > Really please to ear ;)
> > >
> > > I will, starting from next week, refactor the descriptor as proposed.
> > >
> > > Raphaël
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have any bandwidth to help with that?
> > > >
> > > > I will walk through the code in its entirety but not until next week.
> > > >
> > > > Jason.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Brett
> > > > >
> > > > > On 09/04/2007, at 12:37 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 3/4/07, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@...> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> The Archetype plugin has lost the ability to "package" non-Java
> > > > >>> resources.  It looks like this happened with the addition of 'sub
> > > > >>> packages' for Java sources.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ping. Any thoughts on whether the problem with "packaging" resources
> > > > >> should be fixed in the existing archetype code or whether
> > > > >> maven-archetypeng will be ready soon?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It's http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-65 .
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Wendy
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
> >
> >
>