> I pasted the whole modello file here
http://rafb.net/p/E4CXrv28.html>
> Regards,
>
>
> Raphaël
>
> 2007/4/15, Raphaël Piéroni <
raphaelpieroni@...>:
> > Sorry,
> >
> > you can see in the sources
> > in the first comment of the archetype-descriptor-new.xml in
> > the archetypeng-archetype-descriptor project.
> >
> > It has been commented in the "plugin proposition" mail thread.
> >
> > I copy here:
> > <archetype id="archetype-artifact-id" partial="true|false" >
> > <requiredProperties>
> > <requiredProperty key="propKey" defaultValue="string to
> > replace" />
> > </requiredProperties>
> > <fileSets>
> > <fileSet filtered="true|false" packaged="true|false" />
> > <directory>src/main/java</directory>
> > <includes>
> > <include>**/*.java</include>
> > </includes>
> > <excludes>
> > <exclude>Main.java</exclude>
> > </excludes>
> > </fileSet>
> > </file-sets>
> > <modules>
> > <module id="module-artifact-id">
> > <fileSets/>
> > <modules/>
> > </module>
> > </modules>
> > </archetype>
> >
> > 2007/4/15, Franz Allan Valencia See <
franz.see@...>:
> > > Btw, what is the proposed new descriptor format? :-)
> > >
> > > On 4/13/07, Raphaël Piéroni <
raphaelpieroni@...> wrote:
> > > > 2007/4/9, Jason van Zyl <
jason@...>:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8 Apr 07, at 10:41 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It seems apparent now that we should push forward with the ng
> > > > > > stuff. I was going to test if it is at least equivalent to trunk
> > > > > > and then propose bringing it in to replace trunk and start to plan
> > > > > > out 1.0 from there.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It doesn't work the same yet, the mojos are just stubbed out and I
> > > > > have yet to get it to create an archetype though the tests are pretty
> > > > > good so far.
> > > >
> > > > Really please to ear ;)
> > > >
> > > > I will, starting from next week, refactor the descriptor as proposed.
> > > >
> > > > Raphaël
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone have any bandwidth to help with that?
> > > > >
> > > > > I will walk through the code in its entirety but not until next week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jason.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Brett
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 09/04/2007, at 12:37 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 3/4/07, Wendy Smoak <
wsmoak@...> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> The Archetype plugin has lost the ability to "package" non-Java
> > > > > >>> resources. It looks like this happened with the addition of 'sub
> > > > > >>> packages' for Java sources.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ping. Any thoughts on whether the problem with "packaging" resources
> > > > > >> should be fixed in the existing archetype code or whether
> > > > > >> maven-archetypeng will be ready soon?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It's
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-65 .
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Wendy
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
> > >
> > >
> >
>