Re: Changing expectations

>
> Hi,
>
> is there already documentation on this?
>
> regards,
>
> Wim
>
> Dale King-2 wrote:
>>
>> What he probably doesn't realize (and this seems to be a big stumbling
>> block
>> for new users) is that you can break your expectations up into multiple
>> context.checking calls. I know there have been several people come here
>> with
>> the same issue.
>>
>> The cheat sheet documentation really needs to be updated to make this
>> clear.
>> I submitted a JIRA issue for it.
>>
>> On Nov 26, 2007 2:59 PM, Nat Pryce <nat.pryce@...> wrote:
>>
>>> On 26/11/2007, Harald Ueland <harald@...> wrote:
>>> > Is there a way to change return values for expectations after they are
>>> set?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> > I want to do this for some tests where 99 % of the test methods use
>>> predefined
>>> > expectations set up from setUp(), but a few needs other return values.
>>> >
>>> > How can this be done without calling a setup method in all the tests?
>>>
>>> It cannot.  That's because pulling the common setup into a clearly
>>> named utility method makes tests *much* easier to understand.
>>>
>>> --Nat
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>
>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dale King
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Changing-expectations-tp13949061p23479296.html
> Sent from the jMock - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>