Re: Clueless about error

I read the content, by the way.
I didn't specify the attribute names that will be marshalled. Because when
omitted, all of them become avaiable. But, nonethenless, I will enable only
those that I really need, that will improve security and performance. The
stackTraceElement is figured out by now. Thank you.

David Marginian-3 wrote:
>
> Did you read the docs I sent?  My guess is that you have added a converter
> for Exception but not one for the fields on Exception (in your case
> stackTrace).
> http://directwebremoting.org/dwr/other/errors.html
>
> At the very bottom of the "Exceptions" section this is covered.
>
> "Clearly, permission will be needed to convert nested properties, which
> includes the stack trace. By default, there is no permission to convert
> StackTrace elements. It is a good idea to either expose only the
> information
> that you wish to expose (better for a live environment):
>
> <convert match="java.lang.Exception" converter="exception">
>

> </convert>
>
> Or allow stack traces too, (which can be useful in development):
>
> <convert match="java.lang.StackTraceElement" converter="bean"/>
>
> Aside from the fact that this is obviously insecure, it can also be quite
> verbose, so it might be best to use this technique only when the browser
> and
> web-server are close together in network terms."
> - David
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, luke_saluti
> <luke_saluti@...>wrote:
>
>>
>> Just to add:
>>
>> picture the following stack trace:
>>
>> NumberFormatException java.util.ArrayList
>> SQLException               lsf.com.teste.Class, line 50
>>
>> I found impossible to get the messages e lineNumbers that relate
>> specifically to our company packages. Since the project deals with lots
>> of
>> developers, this approach has been proven useful to us.
>> To get it we perform an iteration. Do you see any problems with that?
>> Below
>> goes the example
>>
>> function errorHandler(msg, ex)
>> {
>> if(ex.stackTrace)
>>  {
>>    var stack = ex.stackTrace;
>>    //looking for the specific lsf root package.
>>    for(var i = 0 ; i < stack.length && found = false ; i++)
>>    {
>>      if(stack[i].className.search(/lsf/) >= 0)
>>      {
>>        msgDWR.metodo = stack[i].methodName + "|" + stack[i].lineNumber;
>>        msgDWR.classe = stack[i].className;
>>        found = true;
>>      }
>>    }
>>  }
>>
>> //do something with msgDWR
>> }
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Clueless-about-error-tp24035958p24041880.html
>>  Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>>
>>
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Clueless-about-error-tp24035958p24042089.html

Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...