Re: Code Review Request - Bug #6948101 & 7142596: RMI JPRT tests are failing

On 18/04/2012 21:39, Darryl Mocek wrote:
> :
>
> Brilliant!  I didn't realize Registry.toString included the port
> number.  However, I did in fact find a way to get the port through the
> API's (see below), although I think toString is more efficient.  I'm
> pretty sure I can get rid of the instanceof checks.
I don't have a strong opinion as to whether it uses toString or depends
on sun.rmi.server.RegistryImpl. The main thing is that I think it will
be a lot more reliable to bind to an ephemeral port when compared to
find an unused port.

Just so you know, I grabbed the patch from your webrev and tried it out,
it was nice to see close to x4 improvement when running these tests with
-concurrency:auto on an 4-core system.

-Alan