Vero- I think the first question is much more pertinent and I don't think
#7 adequately covers it.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Vero Zheng wrote:
-) Thanks Lenny for the comments. For the first question, we believe it has been covered by Q7, though not directly. For the second question, even though we don't feel it really help with the main goal, but we have incorporated in the questionnaire since there's interests.
-) The final questionnaire is attached.
-)
-) BR,
-) Vero
-)
-) > -----Original Message-----
-) > From: Stig Venaas [mailto:
stig@...]
-) > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 5:32 AM
-) > To: Vero Zheng
-) > Cc:
pim@...; Rishabh Parekh (riparekh); Mike McBride; Marshall Eubanks
-) > Subject: Re: [pim] Collect Comments on RFC4601 Implementations and
-) > Deployments Survey Questionnaire Revision
-) >
-) > Please read carefully what Vero posted and see if anything should be
-) > changed. If no comments are received by March 22nd, the current survey
-) > text will be sent out to implementers/vendors and operators to get
-) > their information.
-) >
-) > It is important that we get the information we want, so if you have any
-) > thoughts on this survey, please provide your input before March 22nd.
-) >
-) > Stig
-)
_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
pim@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
