WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days. If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration on the Nabble Support forum. Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.

 « Return to Thread: Comments on Canon's G12

Re: Comments on Canon's G12 vs Olympus E-P3 PEN

by Trevor Cunningham-2 :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

I know it's in a completely different price bracket, but I was thinking
of picking up an around town camera and read a series of positive
reviews of the Olympus E-P3 PEN...anyone here have input on this four
thirds system camera?

On 3/28/12 8:41 PM, asharpe@... wrote:

> Well, I bought a used A590 about 1 year ago, and it's ok, but certainly
> the noise is pretty bad above ISO 400. It does go to down to ISO 80,
> though. And, I bought it for about $77 on ebay. As the G12 is about $400,
> I would expect that it should perform at least 4 times as well as the 590.
> And, the G12 shoots RAW, which I would have loved to have on the 590. But
> for general usability, manual modes (which is why I bought it) and value,
> the 590 is very good. I heard very good things about the G10 when it came
> out; I'd be surprised if Canon made the G12 worse than the G10.
>
> In short, it's probably a very good camera for what you are looking for,
> as I would expect a $400 P&S to be.
>
> Have you read the dpreview of it? They are usually quite complete in terms
> of IQ and performance. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG12/
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wed, March 28, 2012 9:54 am, Bob wrote:
>> While looking for info for my daughter I noticed some good prices on the
>> G12.  I'm considering it as a replacement for my Powershot A590 as a
>> "have a camera with me whenever"
>>
>>
>> Any comments on image quality and low light focus speed?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Bob
>> --
>> Money can't buy happiness--- But somehow it's more comfortable to cry in
>> a Porsche than a Kia.
>>
>

 « Return to Thread: Comments on Canon's G12