Re: CompoundModel based on proxies

Scott Swank wrote:
> We're happy to share if folk like this approach.  N.B. that the .to()
> call is for readability rather than out of any necessity.

I'm quite interested in this. This looks like it is just crazy and
clever enough to be really useful :-)

Thanks!
Carl-Eric

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...