Brian Fox wrote:
> Almost certainly no. The 2.1 you saw mentioned most likely refers to
> the old 2.1 that is now 3.0. FWIW, I don't believe this has been or
> will be addressed in 3.0.0 which is focused on 2.x compatibility.
>
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2008/11/a-visual-history-of-maven-2/>
Thanks for the response. I guess I'll try my hand at using a lock file
or something similar in my wrapper scripts. I'm thinking that this
algorithm might work:
sleep_until_granted_lock
mvn dependency:go-offline
release_lock
mvn --offline deploy
Any thoughts on the above?
--
Jason Voegele
An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest.
-- Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
