On 29/02/2008, at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> why 1.1.x?
in case there was a bugfix release on 1.1? I thought that was what the
branch was for... maintenance of 1.1.
or is there going to be 2 completely different strands of development?
- Brett
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Brett Porter <
brett@...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on
>> a branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each,
>> and
>> none merged to the other.
>>
>> Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to
>> 1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and
>> use that for bugfixes only?
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>>
brett@...
>>
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@...
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
