On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Brett Porter <
brett@...> wrote:
>
> On 29/02/2008, at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> > why 1.1.x?
>
> in case there was a bugfix release on 1.1? I thought that was what the
> branch was for... maintenance of 1.1.
>
> or is there going to be 2 completely different strands of development?
I thought to do 1.x in the branch instead of only maintenance in
1.1.xbecause I don't know how many time we'll need for the first
2.0 release. User will probably need some new small feature before the
2.0release and not only maintenance.
>
>
> - Brett
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Brett Porter <
brett@...>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on
> >> a branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each,
> >> and
> >> none merged to the other.
> >>
> >> Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to
> >> 1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and
> >> use that for bugfixes only?
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brett Porter
> >>
brett@...
> >>
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
>
brett@...
>
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/>
>
