Re: Confused about the branches

>
>  On 05/03/2008, at 5:18 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>  > 2008/3/4, Brett Porter <brett@...>:
>  >>
>  >> On 04/03/2008, at 10:47 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>  >>
>  >>> Agree on this.
>  >>> Currently there is a blocking issue with xml-rpc CONTINUUM-1590
>  >>> which
>  >>> prevent using xml-rpc :-(.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Cool - shall we just start using the 1.2 bucket in JIRA? There are
>  >> only 14 issues there now so maybe we could keep that to 20-30 issues
>  >> all together and release it.
>  >
>  > +1
>
>
> ok, I'll get my stuff in there
>
>
>  >
>  >
>  >>
>  >> I found these changes on trunk that are not on the branch: r617400.
>  >> (The rest is documentation)
>  >>
>  >> I found these changes on the branch that are not on trunk: r627196,
>  >> r620613, r620612, r620611
>  >>
>  >> I think we should just merge all those from the branch to trunk, set
>  >> it as v1.2, and close the branch for now?
>  >
>  > +1. (Perso, I don't really like the idea of starting a parrallel
>  > branch/trunk "a la" mvn 2.1 :-) )
>
>
> I'll merge the changes to trunk - but will wait to hear other's
>  opinions on this too before changing the branch

>
>
>  >
>  >
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>> If no objections, I will change root pom to not have anymore maven
>  >>> pom
>  >>> as parent.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Sounds good - do you think we should have a Continuum parent POM like
>  >> we do for Archiva?
>  >
>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/parent/trunk ?
>  > A new pom without parent ? (I can certainly copy some contents from
>  > the maven parent pom)
>
>
> With an ASF parent instead of the Maven one, yep.
>
>
>  >
>  >
>  > Question : do we have to change the groupId in the poms :
>  > org.apache.maven.continuum -> org.apache.continuum ( java package too
>  > ? looks a big bang)
>
>
> I don't see any downside to doing this :)
>
>
>  - Brett
>
>
>  --
>  Brett Porter
>  brett@...
>  http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>