>
> > Unfortunately we can't do bytecode manipulations, so iPOJO is out of the
> > question. And I am not really happy with all this iPOJO magic with
> private
> > fields.
>
> iPOJO does the manipulation at packaging time (think of it as another
> compiler). There is an online manipulator as well but for the general
> case all you need is to run this compiler one time over your jar and
> thats it then. So I don't think its out of the question because of
yes, I understand that, but it's some kind of a policy in my company and
there is little you can do about it.
--
Dmitry Skavish