On 08/16/11 21:29, Olaf Kock wrote:
> If nobody else replies and states otherwise you can safely assume that
> no work is being done for providing a database backend. I'm assuming
> that nobody objects this work to be done and it can also be included
> with the product /if the default setup stays as simple as it currently
> is/. The users that have chosen pebble have done so for exactly this
> reason. But I guess nobody would object having other possibilities
> should they ever want them.
>
> But first you might ask yourself why you actually want to do the work -
> scaling, backup, enterprise-acceptance, just-being-used-to-it come to my
> mind as possible reasons.
I think that's an excellent summary. Perhaps this should be a FAQ entry
on the website somewhere?
--
Alan Burlison
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
tools developers use with it.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2_______________________________________________
Pebble-user mailing list
Pebble-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pebble-user
