From the command it's easy to support configurable directory structures, but
if you plan on using Visual Studio, I strongly encourage the flat directory
structure, as that is inline with VS conventions and makes syncing the pom
and csproj files much easier.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Wendy Smoak <
wsmoak@...> wrote:
> From Maven, we have the src/main/java convention for Java projects...
> what convention is NMaven going to promote for .NET projects? (And
> how much deviation from that is going to be supported?)
>
> What does a well-structured .NET project look like? I'm particularly
> interested in multi-module projects.
You can have flat directory structures, with a parent pom one level up.
Shane
>
> One I saw today had a flat structure, with the "parent" directory
> (with the .sln file) at the same level as directories containing
> .csproj files and source code. This leaves nowhere to put the pom.xml
> files, unless you put them right beside the .csproj files and use
> <sourceDirectory>.</sourceDirectory> (and I'm not even sure that would
> work...)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Wendy
>
