On Thursday 31 May 2007 05:52, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> >> I'd rather see each jar get its own javadoc,
> >> or at the very least, indicate which jar each
> >> class is defined in for the ones that aren't
> >> part of the core.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, I don't like that all the contribs are built in together.
> > What do others think? I would vote for separating them out.
>
> I concur with having the contrib docs separated. I may have been the
> one (or at least assisted with it) who got the documentation build to
> fold it altogether as that was the goal at the time. It'd be much
> easier, build-wise, if all artifacts were kept entirely separate for
> all the various contrib libraries and the core, as well as the demo.
Currently it is not clear in the javadocs whether a class belongs
to core or contrib. Having separate javadocs would probably
improve that.
I have no experience in linking between javadoc "packages",
so I have no suggestion on how to make such a separation.
Regards,
Paul Elschot
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
java-dev-help@...
