Hmm. When I start a very recent (revision 581630) build of ActiveMQ
>
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
>
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/>
>
>
> On Oct 3, 2007, at 8:50 AM, David Sitsky wrote:
>
>> I have discovered an issue with the latest activemq 5.0 (revision
>> 581510) which seems to have been present for some time, at least
>> for the last month.
>>
>> I have an application using transactions, and kaha persistence,
>> and two consumers feeding off a queue.
>>
>> I sometimes see the same message being sent to two consumers. All
>> transactions were committed (no rollbacks), and as you can see by
>> the debug dump, the message has the same message-ID, but was
>> delivered to two separate consumers, running on separate threads,
>> using sync receives with a prefetch of 0, with separate sessions
>> of course.
>>
>> Is this a known problem? It doesn't always happen - seems to be a
>> race condition. If I turn off persistence, I don't seem to see it.
>>
>> Here is the message being delivered to consumer 1:
>>
>> 2007-10-03 17:21:37,310 [Worker 060bacd87f4a40a4867113e2e3e553dd]
>> 85475 DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer -
>> ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:3:2 received message:
>> MessageDispatch {commandId = 0, responseRequired = false,
>> consumerId = ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:3:2, destination
>> = queue://worker-items, message = ActiveMQObjectMessage {commandId
>> = 50, responseRequired = false, messageId =
>> ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:1:3:1, originalDestination =
>> null, originalTransactionId = null, producerId =
>> ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:1:3, destination = queue://
>> worker-items, transactionId =
>> TX:ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:5, expiration = 0,
>> timestamp = 1191396097286, arrival = 0, brokerInTime =
>> 1191396097290, brokerOutTime = 1191396097303, correlationId =
>> null, replyTo = null, persistent = true, type = null, priority =
>> 4, groupID = null, groupSequence = 0, targetConsumerId = null,
>> compressed = false, userID = null, content =
>> org.apache.activemq.util.ByteSequence@fa8cbc, marshalledProperties
>> = null, dataStructure = null, redeliveryCounter = 0, size = 0,
>> properties = null, readOnlyProperties = true, readOnlyBody = true,
>> droppable = false}, redeliveryCounter = 0}
>>
>> Here is the same message (check the message ID) being delivered to
>> consumer 2:
>>
>> 2007-10-03 17:21:37,422 [Worker 2c3169d1726b4781a423a239f65c7bd1]
>> 85587 DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer -
>> ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:1:2 received message:
>> MessageDispatch {commandId = 0, responseRequired = false,
>> consumerId = ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:1:2, destination
>> = queue://worker-items, message = ActiveMQObjectMessage {commandId
>> = 50, responseRequired = false, messageId =
>> ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:1:3:1, originalDestination =
>> null, originalTransactionId = null, producerId =
>> ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:1:3, destination = queue://
>> worker-items, transactionId =
>> TX:ID:tamarama-62436-1191396093006-2:2:5, expiration = 0,
>> timestamp = 1191396097286, arrival = 0, brokerInTime =
>> 1191396097290, brokerOutTime = 1191396097417, correlationId =
>> null, replyTo = null, persistent = true, type = null, priority =
>> 4, groupID = null, groupSequence = 0, targetConsumerId = null,
>> compressed = false, userID = null, content =
>> org.apache.activemq.util.ByteSequence@1a881cc,
>> marshalledProperties = null, dataStructure = null,
>> redeliveryCounter = 0, size = 0, properties = null,
>> readOnlyProperties = true, readOnlyBody = true, droppable =
>> false}, redeliveryCounter = 0}
>>
>> I'll need to do more investigations tomorrow, but if anybody has
>> any ideas, I'd appreciate some insights.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>> Nuix Pty Ltd
>> Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Ph: +61 2
>> 9280 0699
>> Web:
http://www.nuix.com Fax: +61 2
>> 9212 6902
>
"I see this as coming down to mutual respect. I want to respect the
truth. I want to respect their good intentions enough to believe that