|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Re: Error in fcmix_serial for Sundials-2.4.0Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:11:42 +0200
Message-ID: <3f94f5490910111611v7ccbcac8had910ba5ed37ceea@...> Subject: Re: [sundials-users] Error in fcmix_serial for Sundials-2.4.0 From: Roberto Lemoine <robertolemoine@...> To: sundials-users@... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ca5aac98410475b0ef84 --00504502ca5aac98410475b0ef84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello everyone: I would appreciate your help. My problem is, that everytime that I start a simulation using the interface SUNDIALS_TB for Matlab, with the IDA Solver, using exactly the same parameters, initial estimates, etc., I get very different situations (sometimes I get Not-A-Numbers, sometimes it converges, sometimes it uses step sizes ridiculously small, etc), even with consistent initial conditions. I suspect that some garbage might be fed in the solver because an erroneous utilization / combination of IDAInit, IDAReinit and IDAFree. However, I am not sure. Can somebody help with this issue? Thanks a lot! Roberto Lemoine --00504502ca5aac98410475b0ef84 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone:<br><br>I would appreciate your help. My problem is, that ev= erytime that I start a simulation using the interface SUNDIALS_TB for Matla= b, with the IDA Solver, using exactly the same parameters, initial estimate= s, etc., I get very different situations (sometimes I get Not-A-Numbers, so= metimes it converges, sometimes it uses step sizes ridiculously small, etc)= , even with consistent initial conditions.<br> <br>I suspect that some garbage might be fed in the solver because an erron= eous utilization / combination of IDAInit, IDAReinit and IDAFree. However, = I am not sure. Can somebody help with this issue? Thanks a lot!<br><br> Roberto Lemoine<br><br> --00504502ca5aac98410475b0ef84-- |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Error in fcmix_serial for Sundials-2.4.0Hello Roberto- Have you tried solving the problem with IDA directly, not via Matlab? That way we would know if the problem is in IDA or in SundialsTB. -Alan H On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, by way of Carol Woodward <cswoodward@...> wrote: > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:11:42 +0200 > Message-ID: <3f94f5490910111611v7ccbcac8had910ba5ed37ceea@...> > Subject: Re: [sundials-users] Error in fcmix_serial for Sundials-2.4.0 > From: Roberto Lemoine <robertolemoine@...> > To: sundials-users@... > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ca5aac98410475b0ef84 > > --00504502ca5aac98410475b0ef84 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hello everyone: > > I would appreciate your help. My problem is, that everytime that I start a > simulation using the interface SUNDIALS_TB for Matlab, with the IDA Solver, > using exactly the same parameters, initial estimates, etc., I get very > different situations (sometimes I get Not-A-Numbers, sometimes it converges, > sometimes it uses step sizes ridiculously small, etc), even with consistent > initial conditions. > > I suspect that some garbage might be fed in the solver because an erroneous > utilization / combination of IDAInit, IDAReinit and IDAFree. However, I am > not sure. Can somebody help with this issue? Thanks a lot! > > Roberto Lemoine > > --00504502ca5aac98410475b0ef84 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable |
|
|
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |