On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Pablo d'Angelo
<pablo.dangelo@...> wrote:
The idea was that:
1. A relative exposure compensation cannot be read from the exif data.
Of course this only applies when hugin does read the images correctly.
Hi,
I wasn't implying that we read exposure compensation values, I just meant why not just work around 0 as the starting point for any corrections made by Hugin to the image exposure. Basically what happens now when there is no EXIF data available.
2. If a "true" hdr needs to be generated, the exposure values of the
camera should be used (unless they are not accurate), because there is
an ambiguity when estimating exposure and response curve at the same time.
I see. I was wondering if that was the case.
Thanks for your insight!
Best Regards,
- Gerry
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to
hugin-ptx@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
