Re: Fixing integration tests and running them against 0.14

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Brett Porter <brett@...> wrote:
> On 18/08/2008, at 8:15 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:

>> Also is the convention to require NUnit explicitly listed in the pom
>> to run the tests? seems so as the tests need to be annotated with
>> NUnit annotations
>
> That would make sense to me - same as junit, etc in Java?

It seems to have an added complication here-- if the installed version
of NUnit (nunit-console) is different from the one in the pom, it can
cause the tests to not run correctly.

Java doesn't require that JUnit be installed and on your PATH.

--
Wendy