On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>> Wouldn't it work if I just use the predefined "project" descriptor?
>> Yes, if you do not have any source packages called "target".
>
> Really, what about the LICENSE/NOTICE files that get generated under
> target? As far as I grok the "project" descriptor (and also the
> "src" descriptor), these would be missing from the root of the
> source archive.
I think Brian disagrees with me, but my understanding of the lengthy
conversation on legal-discuss includes concluding that svn needs
LICENSE and NOTICE files at expected checkout roots that cover what is
actually in svn, as opposed to what gets in the binary, javadoc, or
source jars. So these would get added to the source release packaging.
thanks
david jencks
> Also, the "project" descriptor would produce an assembly with the
> classifier "project", not what we want, do we?
>
>
> Benjamin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
