Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License

Donovan Hawkins wrote:

> However, I think omitting a provision like clause 13 of the MPL is more problematic if it leads
> people to avoid releasing under multiple licenses.

That clause is really completely unnecessary.  Most OSI-approved
licenses don't have it, and the copyright holder doesn't need it to be
able to dual-license.

Matt Flaschen