Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>
> Sergey Chernyshev wrote:
>> MediaWiki team is switching to HTML 5. I planned to work on
>> integrating RDFa support to Semantic MediaWiki core, but now the
>> question is, how far is RDFa from haveing something working in HTML 5
>> namespace?
> Technically, RDFa is defined in the HTML5 namespace, since HTML5 and
> XHTML M12N share a namespace. So I think you are fine.
>>
>> Can you say in a couple of words what stops people from consuming RDFa
>> in HTML 5? in real world that is (e.g. Yahoo, Google, smaller developers?)
> In the real world there is no HTML5. There have been a couple of
> working drafts published. In the real world, I would stick to HTML4 or
> XHTML 1. You can safely use RDFa in these contexts. It works great!
> ...
That is totally misleading.
There is no spec for RDFa-in-HTNL. Not even a working draft, as far as I
can tell.
BR, Julian
(and yes, I'm a supporter of RDFa, but claiming that "there is no
HTML5", and then in the same sentence saying you can do RDFa-in-HTML????)
