Danny Smith wrote:
> As I understand, "inline dllimport" under MSVC means:
> "inline, if possible, else resolve as external defined in another module (specifically a
> dll)."
Are you sure? Everything I've seen indicates the 'inline' should be
ignored, and I can't get MSVC to do anything other than that.
These new semantics seem opposite, ignore the 'dllimport' and use the
inline.
It's just I'm concerned this will not cause an export where it should,
which changes how the ABI works. It seems to me that its very important
we emulate MSVC in these matters.
But if you think this is OK, then I won't object further.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone_______________________________________________
MinGW-dvlpr mailing list
MinGW-dvlpr@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-dvlpr
