Stephan Assmus wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> I read somewhere that GDI+ uses hardware accelerated font rendering (or
>> something along those lines). If this is correct, is it also correct
>> that switching to GDI+ font rendering (only) would give me a performance
>> boost? I seem to have a bootleneck in my font rendering pipeline.
>>
>
> Are you already using a bitmap cache? If not, this may give you a substantial performance boost. Depends a bit on the fact whether you have transformed text or straight text only.
>
> Best regards,
> -Stephan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
> Download the free 60 day trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com>
I am transforming text and I am using cache manager as the samples
suggest. However, I think the problem may be the fact that prior to
sending to the scanline I am doing a path_storage.concat(char_glyph) to
build up the text-string plus other things, so I will try to change my
logic. Changing it will also facilitate be being able to test GDI+
performance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com_______________________________________________
Vector-agg-general mailing list
Vector-agg-general@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vector-agg-general