« Return to Thread: GPLv2 or GPLv2+

Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+

by Ludovic Courtès :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Hi,

"Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray" <debarshi.ray@...> writes:

> Each source file which has a license header asks the reader to refer
> to the src/COPYING file for the license terms of the package in this
> case.

You're right: these are "non-standard" headers, so we're stuck (i.e.,
your interpretation that it's "GPLv2-only" sounds right).  And since
there are several copyright holders (and not the FSF), we're all the
more stuck.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludovic.


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/

 « Return to Thread: GPLv2 or GPLv2+