Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+

Thomas Lord writes:

 > Sorry for the mess but, whatcha gonna do?

Is there a mess?  Legally, it's perfectly clear that it's GPLv2-only.
The only legal problem is that if a file gets distributed separately
from the COPYING file, the recipient has no way of knowing her GPL
rights, except to ask the author or a distributor.  Big deal, you like
getting mail about your code, no? :-)

It's only a real problem if you want to delegate decisions about the
terms of your license to the FSF.  But I thought it was not your
intent to do so at that time.



_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/