On Monday 11 January 2010 16:15:38 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On 11 jan 2010, at 17.49, Zack Rusin wrote:
> > I think the other stuff is acceptable. Take a look at the docs and
> > let me know
> > what you think.
>
> Hmm I don't think you should remove the CAPs but instead just say if
> level X then CAPs Y,Z,W,Q are assumed to be present. This way the
> hardware that fall between the cracks can expose one level plus the
> extra CAPs it can do.
Would that be useful for anything? Or do you mean feature level + exceptions,
oterhwise what's the point of feature levels if nothing supports them fully.
> Another thing level 3 and below harder can not do ARB_npot but they
> can do NV_texture_rect, the only hardware we have drivers that this
> matter for is nv30 (I think) and r300.
Yes, that's what the "unnormalized coords" part is about :)
z
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
