GalleryUrlGenerator and GallerySession have gotten crazy-complex in
order to support: interoperability and security.
If a framework has reasonable performance and it gives us these things,
seems like a pretty good idea to me.
- Alan
Chad Kieffer wrote:
> Splitting from the main Gx thread. Seemed like a big subject unto
> itself...
>
> When the thought of using an existing framework was tossed out a few
> weeks back, I wondered how seriously is this option being considered.
> If thoughts on this subject have already been discussed in IRC or in
> the thread, I may have missed them, sorry.
>
> Could folks share their thoughts on this subject here?
>
> Seems like making the choice to use a framework could free up
> developer cycles and provide more focus on Gx feature development. On
> the other hand, the Gallery framework is pretty damned powerful,
> tested, and known by the team. Thoughts? What are your attachments/
> interests in using Gallery 2, existing PHP Frameworks, or something
> else as a foundation?
>
> Here's what I've read/heard recently about about CodeIgniter and Zend
> Framework.
>
> CodeIgniter seems to now be known as providing significantly better
> performance than the rest of the frameworks. This is in part due to
> Rasmus' recent talk on PHP Frameworks. Other than performance, I
> don't know much else about the merits of CodeIgniter.
>
>
http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/08/29/rasmus-lerdorf-php-frameworks-think-again/>
> I've worked a bit with the Zend Framework in recent months. It's been
> dinged for increasingly poor performance in recent releases. The next
> major release promises to focus heavily on performance improvements.
> Their roadmap states that v2.0 will heavily leverage improvements in
> PHP 5.3. ZF has support for unit testing (to some degree), dojo
> integration (should be able to substitute YUI or other), a nice ACL
> component, and Zend_Tool promises to offer all sorts of command line
> tooling capabilities.
>
> Seems to me that ZF has really increased project momentum over the
> past year. Their partnership with Adobe to simplify interactions
> between Flex and ZF apps might be of some interest when discussing RIA
> interfaces/features in Gx like drag and drop, etc.
>
> All of this is fine and well, but ZF 2.0 won't be released until well
> into next year.
>
>
http://phpimpact.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/zend-framework-controller-22-drop-in-responsiveness/>
http://www.phpjack.com/content/zendframe-works-future (see Matthew's
> Clarification comment)
>
http://blogs.adobe.com/flex/archives/2008/09/adobe_and_zend_announce_collab.html>
> Thoughts?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/> __[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________
>
> [ list info/archive -->
http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ]
> [ gallery info/FAQ/download -->
http://gallery.sf.net ]
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/__[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________
[ list info/archive -->
http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ]
[ gallery info/FAQ/download -->
http://gallery.sf.net ]