Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)

Sam Ruby wrote:
> My take: while it is possible to construct such examples, in practice
> they would be rare enough to not be an issue.  That being said, it is
> nearly impossible to legislate against, as it would require people to
> avoid declaring namespaces prefix that matches any current or future
> URI scheme.  Perhaps a "SHOULD avoid well known URI schemes" might be
> in order.
I like this.  In fact, I am sure we used to have text like that.  Not
sure why it was removed, but +1 from me!


--
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@...