Andrew Coppin wrote:
> Deniz Dogan wrote:
>> 2009/6/28 Andrew Coppin <
andrewcoppin@...>:
>>> Well, it *does* mean I'll have to figure out how Cabal actually
>>> works...
>>>
>>
>> Usually, it's pretty straight-forward and most options are
>> self-explanatory.
>>
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Packaging#The_Cabal_file>>
>
> Yes, one would *hope* that a 1-module library with no dependencies
> would be fairly trivial. ;-)
Ah, but it's not as easy as you'd think. The instructions above fail to
mention several required or strongly recommended fields. (E.g.,
apparently Category and Synopsis are both required, Cabal-Version is
strongly recommended, several fields are meant to be in the Library
subsection...) And then of course there's the question of choosing a
licence. But I think I'm nearly there now.
Oh, one last thing. I know I'm going to regret this for the rest of my
life, but... which version of Base should it depend on?
> Also Haddock; I'm thinking some documentation might be nice...
This at least *was* fairly trivial. ;-) [The only hard part being
figuring out how to manually run Haddock...]
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
