Thank you for the suggestion.
I wrote this four years ago. Was this form of array definition in
effect back then?
gratefully - Mark
>Just a general suggestion... whenever you find yourself writing:
>
>~p1 = ...;
>~p2 = ...;
>etc.
>
>... you'll be much better served by an array.
>
>p = [1, 81/80, etc.];
>
>Then, instead of
>
>> p1list=[~p18, ~p19, ~p20, ~p22, ~p24, ~p25, ~p26,
>> ~p27, ~p28, ~p29, ~p30, ~p33, ~p43];
>
>You could do
>
>p1list = p[[17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 42]];
>
>It does mean thinking from 0 rather than 1 but isn't that a much
>cleaner syntax?
>hjh
>
>On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Mark Ballora <
ballora@...> wrote:
>> I created this backdrop of shifting tones from his scale for a piece.
>> I defined the ratios and multiplied them by a fundamental.
>>
>> ~p1=1.round(1); // 1/1
>> ~p2=1.0125.round(1.0125); // 81/80
>> ~p3=1.03125.round(1.03125); // 33/32
>
>--
>James Harkins /// dewdrop world
>
jamshark70@...
>
http://www.dewdrop-world.net>
>"Come said the Muse,
>Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
>Sing me the universal." -- Whitman
>_______________________________________________
>sc-users mailing list
>
sc-users@...
>
http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
sc-users@...
http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
